Thursday, September 30, 2010

The role of coal in the United States?

In 2008 Wyoming produced carbon 468 million tonnes, almost 40% of the coal mined in the United States. West Virginia was the second largest producer, 158 million tonnes (13%).

United States of America is the largest recoverable coal reserves home in the world.In fact, we have enough coal to more than 200 years, the current consumption on the basis of the level of Carbon produced 25. three coal-producing regions in different Member States, but some 75% of the current production comes from just five countries: Wyoming, West Virginia, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, and Montana.

Graph showing Coal Production by Coal-Producing Region, 2008 (Million Short Tons). Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Annual Coal Report 2008

Approximately 93% of U.s. coal consumption electric power sector, but coal is also a certain industrial applications such as cement manufacture and alteration, coke, which are rendered at a temperature of minerals iron ore blast to is made of steel. A small part of the carbon also burned to heat the commercial, military and institutional services and even less this amount shall be used to heat homes.

Over the last 10 years, an increase of about 5% on average in the United States produced coal is exported.US imports also a small number of coal power plants; Some Gulf Coast and Atlantic to find cheaper by sea coal into South America as its transport to the country of indigenous coal mines.

United States of America has more than 1,400 coal fired electricity sähköntuotantoyksiköiden more than 600 installations activities across the country. Together with these plants create nearly half of u.s. electricity produced and consumed about one billion short tons of coal per year.(Annual consumption electric power in the field of Carbon is expected to fall to less than 1 billion short tons in 2009 for the first time since 2002.)

Our share of electricity generated from coal is expected to reduce the 2035. Our growing electricity demand is expected to lead to an increase of the number of actual use, however, because the new policies to limit or reduce carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions coal.These new policies may change significantly coal outlook.

Although some of the natural gas plants are more efficient coal plants, electricity is generated from natural gas electricity one kilowatthour fuel costs in General is higher than the prices of coal coal. Furthermore, the traditionally volatile much less than they are to a large extent, in the long term existence of coal, natural gas supply contracts.

Coal is a large and relatively inexpensive relative to other sources of electricity costs, but its use to produce a wide range of emissions which have a negative effect on the environment.Coal produces sulphur mass of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and mercury that acid rain, Smog and health issues related to.The greenhouse gas carbon dioxide Carbon also produces, not news to link to climate change. Coal accounted for 37% of the United States released in 2008, the Earth's atmosphere of total CO2 emissions. coal mining Without appropriate treatment gives a negative impact on the ecosystems and water quality, and change the landscapes and scenic views.

Pie charts showing U.S. Primary Energy Consumption by Major Fuel Type, 2008 and Resulting U.S. Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions by Major Fuel Type, 2008

Economics and coal burning may change when the United States Congress approves legislation that limits or controls access to the other CO2 emissions, for example, the CAP and trade program to regulate carbon dioxide emissions are likely to increase by burning the carbon content of the coal production cost and the cause of the power companies that have to be a good idea to use less of carbon created technologies such as nuclear, natural gas and renewable energy sources.

Efforts are now underway to develop new technologies in coal burning without emitting as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. scientists have the capacity of the CO2 capture and sequestration (CCS), which is designed to capture up to 90% of the carbon dioxide from coal before it is of the light emitted into the atmosphere, and then save it as below the surface of the CCS could in theory. resolve a lot of carbon's CO2 emissions in the face but many economic and technological hurdles.

What are greenhouse gases and how much they contributed by the United States?

EIA's Energy in Brief: What are greenhouse gases and how much are emitted by the United States? Home > Energy in Brief > What are greenhouse gases and how much are emitted by the United States?Energy in Brief - What everyone should know about energyLast Updated: April 15, 2010< All Energy in Brief Articles What are greenhouse gases and how much are emitted by the United States?

Greenhouse gases trap heat from the sun and warm the planet's surface. Of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, 87% are related to energy consumption. Since 1990, greenhouse gas emissions in the United States have grown by about 1% per year. In 2005, about 21% of the world's total energy-related carbon dioxide was emitted by the United States.

Petroleum is the fossil fuel that accounts for the most carbon dioxide emissions.Pie chart showing: Petroleum 2.6 (44%); Coal 2.1 (36%); Natural Gas 1.2 (20%). Source: Energy Information Administration, Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States 2006 (Nov. 2007)Electricity generation and transportation are the biggest sources of energy-related greenhouse gases.Pie chart showing: Electric Power Sector 39% (2,344); Transportation 34% (1985); Building Direct 27% (1,562). Source: Energy Information AdministrationThe transportation sector currently emits the most energy-related greenhouse gas.Line graph showing trends in Million Metric Tons CO2e. Source: Energy Information Administration.Did You Know?

If it were not for naturally occurring greenhouse gases, the Earth would be too cold to support life as we know it. Without the greenhouse effect, the average temperature of the Earth would be about -2 degrees Fahrenheit rather than the +57 degrees Fahrenheit we currently experience.


Because greenhouse gases trap radiation (heat) from the sun and warm the planet's surface, a certain amount of these gases is beneficial (see "Did You Know?"). But as concentrations of these gases increase due to human activity, more warming occurs than would happen naturally. In 2006, about 7.1 billion metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) of greenhouse gases were emitted by the United States.1 Other countries with significant emissions include China, the countries of Europe, Russia, and Japan.

What Specific Kinds of Greenhouse Gases Does the United States Emit?

The major greenhouse gases the United States emits as a result of human activity and that are included in U.S. and international emissions estimates are:

Carbon dioxide (CO2) Methane (CH4)Nitrous oxide (N2O) High-GWP gases, which are:Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)

There are other greenhouse gases that are not counted in U.S. or international greenhouse gas inventories:

Water vapor is the most abundant greenhouse gas, but most scientists believe that water vapor produced directly by human activity contributes very little to the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere, and therefore EIA does not estimate emissions of water vapor. Recent research by NASA suggests a stronger impact from the indirect human effects on water vapor concentrations.Ozone is technically a greenhouse gas because it has an effect on global temperature. However, at higher elevations in the atmosphere (stratosphere), where it occurs naturally, it is needed to block harmful UV light. At lower elevations of the atmosphere (troposphere) it is harmful to human health and is a pollutant regulated independently of its warming effects.How Much of Total U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Are Energy Related?

Of the total amount of greenhouse gases emitted in 2006, about 5.9 billion metric tons were carbon dioxide from energy consumption (the burning of fossil fuels). Another 0.3 billion metric tons CO2e came from energy-related greenhouse gases other than carbon dioxide for a total of 6.2 out of 7.1 billion metric tons CO2e or about 87%.

Which Fuel Accounts for the Largest Share of Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions?

Petroleum is the largest fuel source of carbon dioxide emissions from energy consumption in the United States. Petroleum carbon dioxide emissions were 2.6 billion metric tons, or 44% of the total, in 2006.


Other important fossil fuel sources of carbon dioxide emissions include:

Coal — accounting for 2.1 billion metric tons (36%) in 2006 Natural gas — accounting for 1.2 billion metric tons (20%) in 2006What Are the Important Non-Carbon Dioxide (Non-CO2) Greenhouse Gases Related to the Production and Consumption of Energy?

Of the non-CO2 gases that contribute to energy-related greenhouse gas emissions, methane contributes most of the 0.3 billion metric tons CO2e — mainly from emissions that leak out of natural gas pipelines, coal mines, and petroleum exploration and production facilities.

How Are Energy-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions Distributed Throughout Our Economy and What Sector of Our Economy Is Responsible for the Most Emissions?

Electric power generation and transportation are the biggest sources of energy-related greenhouse gas emissions in our nation, with respective shares of 39.8% and 33.7% of our total energy-related emissions in 2006. Taken together, emissions in power generation and transportation increased at an average annual rate of 1.5% between 1990 and 2006. The rest of our emissions result from direct use of fossil fuels in homes, commercial buildings, and industry. These emissions are virtually unchanged since 1990.


Since electric power is ultimately used in homes, commercial buildings, and industry, emissions associated with power generation can be allocated to each end-use sector based on their electricity consumption to obtain another perspective. Using this approach, the transportation sector is currently the largest emitter. Our cars, trucks, planes, trains, ships, and barges produced 2.0 billion metric tons CO2e (1.9 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide plus 0.1 billion metric tons CO2e in other gases) in 2006. Emissions from this sector have grown at an average rate of 1.4% since 1990.


The industrial sector — which consists of activities such as manufacturing, construction, mining, and agriculture � emits almost as much as the transportation sector — a total of 1.9 billion metric tons of energy-related CO2e (1.7 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide plus 0.2 billion metric tons CO2e in other gases). Its emissions have been largely stable since 1990 due primarily to the loss of energy-intensive industries such as steel.


The commercial sector — which includes such sources as schools, office buildings, and shopping malls — emits a total of 1.0 billion metric tons CO2e of energy-related carbon dioxide, with almost 80% of it coming from the power plants providing the electricity used in the buildings. Its emissions have grown the fastest since 1990, at an average annual rate of 1.8%.


The residential sector — the homes we live in — emits 1.2 billion metric tons of CO2e, almost all of which is energy-related carbon dioxide, over 70% of which is produced at power plants providing homes electricity. Residential sector emissions have grown at an average annual rate of 1.4% since 1990.

Learn MoreProjections of U.S. energy-related carbon dioxide emissionsProjections of energy-related carbon dioxide for other countriesDetails on all greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. economyAnalysis of proposed legislation to curb greenhouse gas emissionsGreenhouse gases and climate scienceBasic information on energy and the environmentshare icon Share this pageValues expressed as carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e) are calculated based on their global warming potential (GWP). GWP is the ratio of the warming that would result from the emission of one kilogram of a greenhouse gas to that from the emission of one kilogram of carbon dioxide over a fixed period of time such as 100 years.Receive Energy in Brief Updates

Sign up to receive Energy in Brief updates via email!

envelope icon Sign up for more email updatesRSS icon Get the Energy in Brief RSS feed What is RSS? Give Us Your Feedback!

Do you have comments or suggestions about our Energy in Brief pages? We want to hear from you!

Email Address: Energy Information Administration (EIA) Logo - Need Help? 202-586-8800
For larger graphs and maps, and other Energy in Briefs, please visit www.eia.gov/eib

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

What are renewable Portfolio standards (RPS), and how they affect electricity?

Biomass (wood), and the wind is two renewable fuels is assumed to be the most growth in the future, in part as a result of the RPS programs.Bar chart showing: total projected renewable electricty generation, inlcuding additions from existing State-level programs from 2003-2030. Source: Energy Information Administration
The information on this chapter Map of States with Renewable Energy Profiles Standards

2006 Washington State voters approved the RPS depend on certain communications equipment produces 3% of their eligible renewable energy sources by 2012, will increase to 15% by 2020.These add-ins, shall apply to the received generation serving more than 25,000 customers, including add-ins for most State 62 17, representing around 85% of the State electricity. penalty was also in breach of the RPS. This RPS eligible incremental resources are geothermal, hydropower, wind, solar, biomass, landfill gas and waste water treatment facilities in the area and the ocean, wave and tidal power gas.

So, 29 May 2009 in the United States and the District of Columbia is to promote renewable sources of electricity generation from RPS policies in various ways

Renewable energy Portfolio (RPS), also in the standards referred to the standards of electricity produced from renewable energy sources (RES), have policies to increase electricity generation from renewable resources. These policies, which may be mandatory or voluntary, function require or encourage the supply of gas to electricity producers in a given jurisdiction to provide certain minimum standards named of their generation from renewable resources. In most cases, these resources have wind, solar, geothermal, biomass and certain types of hydroelectric power, but may include other resources, such as the landfill, municipal solid waste, ocean heat and tidal energy.

Despite the numerous proposals through the Congress of the RPS is partially developed in recent years, none of which is laid down in the legislation, the national level is currently RPS. Many Member States shall, however, provided for by its own RPS programs.These programs vary widely, the implementation of the State program structure, mechanisms, and the size of the application shall be deemed to be a large number of policies; RPS ways. as a general rule, RPS must define which are considered as eligible renewable energy generation to satisfy the requirement. Eligible costs of the selected resources are often tailored to best fit its state of a particular resource base. Some States also specifies certain types of renewable energy sources to promote the use of renewable electricity generation resource.

Another important property is some of the State policy as well as most of the proposed federal policies, is the allowance of electricity produced from renewable energy sources (REC) trading system. This mechanism allows a producer of electricity, which produces electricity produced from renewable energy sources to trade or sell other communications equipment, that you have adequate RPS eligible electricity produced from renewable energy sources to the RPS requirement generation licences.

This trading system REC to the total cost of compliance with the RPS.Here is how it works: regions with little or expensive renewable resources, electricity suppliers to comply with the generation of orders at a lower cost buy RECs on the other hand, that it is necessary to use only local resources, or their own new generation investments.REC trading mechanism in order to give more flexibility to the limitation of expenses is useful because of the different sources of renewable energy sources are spread throughout the United States of America.

As a general rule the Member States with the RPS policies have seen the eligible amount of the increase in electricity from renewable resources.However, some States also without RPS policies have seen a significant increase in renewable generation over the last recent years, the transition from the Federal incentives to state programs and market conditions.Perhaps the most important of these incentives of the Federal Republic of Germany has been the production tax credit, which makes the tax credits units, generating electricity using new technologies that are eligible for the program to the increase in the generation of renewable energy sources. has often been the most significant when the RPS mandate was in force at the time of the production tax credit was not available for the electricity producers.

The u.s. Energy Information Administration (EIA) examined a number of proposed federal RPS standards. One analyzed in 2007 a proposal called for 15% of the US electricity by 2020, cash proposal is included in the trading program that can create electricity produced from renewable energy sources and buying RECs towards compliance with the new resources are eligible for the special immunity REC. 2. It also distributed resources generated electricity triple credits — i.e. produces Central .8 main generating station, such as the roof-top solar tuulisähkö (PV) system.

Compared to projections in the absence of the proposed specification, EIA analysis showed a tripling of electricity biomass as well as a large increase in wind and solar photovoltaic power generation by 2030. Column EIA projections of renewable generation growth primarily through coal production, but also some nuclear and gas Retail electricity prices were production. predicted to rise by an average of 0.9% without a regular federal RPS price level by 2030, but gas prices decreased as a result of lower demand for natural gas, electric power, there are a number of proposals in the RPS. are now pending in the United States Congress.

Monday, September 20, 2010

What are the major sources of energy in the United States and the users?

Electric power sector has been great changes in the product mix of fuel. Slightly more than 50 years ago, in the field of nuclear energy was not the role of electric power generation, but in 2008, in the field of nuclear energy in the United States send the 21% of the fuel used for electricity. The growing share of Oil provided for in the electronic energy generation through the 1960s, but its share has decreased by 1% in 2008 after 18% in 1973.


Primary sources include petroleum, natural gas, coal, nuclear and renewable energy electricity is a secondary energy source, which was created by the primary renewable energy.


Primary energy sources is measured in units of measurement: there are several things you can chillums (= 42 gallons) of oil cubic metres feet gas, coal tonnes. you want to compare different fuels, we need to share the unit of measure. In the United States is used in British thermal units Btu or, which is measured according to the energy content of the source of the thermal input delivered by each fuel, the fuel.


Of total energy use in the United States in 2008 was close to 100 quadrillion (1015 =, or one thousand trillion) Btu.One quadrillion Btu, often referred to as "quad," is equivalent to about 1% of total energy use in the United States.


Physical energy in 1 quad represents 172 million CatGenie Granules or barrels and oil (8 and 9-day U.s. oil use), 50 million tonnes (enough to produce around 2% on an annual basis, the use of electricity in the United States) installations for the extraction of coal or 1 trillion cubic feet of natural gas (about 4% of the annual United States natural gas usage).


Each of the primary energy used 2008 Mukavuusvaatimukset source number is shown on the left pie. Petroleum (oil) offers the highest proportion of primary energy, natural gas, coal, behind the United States in the field of nuclear energy and renewable sources of energy (including hydro, solar, geothermal, wind and biomass).


Primary energy use in buildings and in the place of residence (including housing, businesses, schools and churches) transportation and primary energy is also used in the industry. generating electricity.A bar chart appears in each of these areas used primaarienergiamuodon. as you can see, the electric power generation is the largest user of primary energy after the transport.


Electric power in the production of electricity by the use of primary energy, which makes it possible to identify the primary energy source instead of electricity in the secondary.Almost all of the electricity used in buildings and industry.This means that the institution of the place of residence and buildings, industrial and transportation of energy combined are actually higher graphics amounts when the electricity has been added.


The primary energy source in the picture below linking circles demand sector rectangles lines with a summary of the source links in the energy system of the market in the United States.For example, because all electricity is used in the field of nuclear energy and nuclear power accounted for 21% of the used primaarienergiamuodon on nuclear energy and electricity sector shows 100% nuclear side (supply source) and 21% of the electric power (demand) side.


Chart showing U.S. primary energy consumption by source and sector for 2008 in quadrillion Btu. Total consumption in 2007 was 101.6 quadrillion Btu. Source: Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Review 2007.


The primary energy mix vary widely in the areas of demand.Designed to influence the primary fuel for use in the field of energy policy, in particular, the environmental, economic, or for security reasons, often focus on the areas of energy, which are major users of the fuel.


Because the 71% of the petroleum (oil) is used in the field of transport, in which it provides 95% of the total amount of energy, in order to reduce the consumption of olive oil policies, for example, tended to focus on the transport sector. these policies will be generally improve with respect to fuel efficiency or to promote alternative fuels. Carbon 90%, but only 1% of the oil, is used to generate electricity, suggesting that the policies are likely to be the generation is much greater impact on the use of coal-oil.


Some of the primary energy sources, such as the nuclear and coal, constitute the whole or the case for most used one sector. other, natural gas and renewable energy sources, such as are more evenly across sectors transport is almost. Likewise, entirely dependent on one fuel (oil), but the power of being fired by different fuels.


Fuels and connections between sectors and may change over time, but the change has a tendency to slowly. for example, coal as fuel was used widely once homes and commercial buildings, but the usage is almost anything in the United States the past vaipuneet half a century, although in renewable energy is still relatively small size of the primary energy transport and electric power input, its importance has increased.

Sunday, September 19, 2010

What is the electric power grid and what are some of the challenges it is facing?

None of the "national" power grid. Is actually three power grids 48 contiguous countries: (1) East of each in relation to the System (non-located on the East side of the Rocky Mountains), (2) of the Western one another out-of-the-box (from the Pacific Ocean to levels approaching zero, Rocky Mountain States), Texas each other System (3). These systems are generally for the operation on gas shall be, even if they are limited to links. The main areas in Canada is fully with power generators in our Western and Eastern parts of power grids, Mexico is limited to Texas and Western power grids.

Electricity generating stations is retrieved from the homes and workplaces, its efficacy is quite a challenging process must be submitted at the same time, electricity, because it is used, because large amounts of electricity cannot be stored effectively.

High-voltage power transmission lines (these lines between the height of the metal towers, which are often along the highway) is used for electricity-producing drives in places where it is needed for power.However, when the electricity goes on top of these lines, some will be lost. one of the high-voltage lines properties is that the higher the voltage, the more powerful they are transmitting electricity — in other words, less losses are. Using transformers, high-voltage electricity is "step down" several times less voltage before the vessel enters the distribution utility poles and wire home and work, so it can be used safely.

Around the beginning of the 20th century was more than 4,000 individual electric utilities, each on their own work. Almost all of them use the links at the nearby pienjännitteisissä distribution systems with a view to creating local stations serve their customers distribution lines.

When the electricity demand increased, in particular, realize the post-world war war era, electric utilities to find more effective to their transmission systems So they could share. building greater benefits and often jointly owned by generators to serve the combined electricity demand as possible at low cost and avoid duplicative power stations construction. Reduce the number of Interconnection capacities, also that each add-in was considered to ensure reliable service.With growing demand and the need for new power plants was accompanied by increasing the need for higher voltage interconnection for the carriage of more power over longer distances. over time, a large three interconnected systems developed in the United States.

Today individual add-in in the ownership of the transmission and the lines are no longer resources can only be used with the Adobe PDFMaker add-in.Electronic systems has been expanded and each other.Relating to the transport of electricity systems give now power transmission lines, where buyers and sellers can be geographically extended to each other.

Three power grids in close supervision is required for operations within all of the various components to each other are now connected to each other. systems of more than 3,200 electric distribution utilities, more than 10 000 sähköntuotantoyksiköiden tens of thousands of kilometres of transmission and distribution lines and millions of customers.

When you create Each company was initially responsible for maintaining the security of your electrical system and customers ' future needs planning. voluntary standards were Subsequently developed electric utility interconnection capacity in order to ensure coordination of the measures linked. These voluntary standards applied in large blackout in 1965, New York, which will affect the East Coast and parts of Canada a large part.

Now planning in a coordinated manner to achieve adequacy, the supply of a lot of set up and monitor the execution of formal operational standards in bulk power systems and address concerns about the safety of our Nation in electrical critical infrastructure to manage All this coordination. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the US Department of energy control with electric power industry new electricity reliability Organization (the North American Electric Reliability Corporation 's), set up in accordance with the procedures required.

Image of National Power Grid, courtesy of Microsoft® Encarta® Encyclopedia

Most of the parts sähkönjohto has existed for years. is usually assumed that some of the replacement and upgrading existing lines are to be carried out, and that new lines constructed in order to maintain the integrity of the overall system.

Power grid infrastructure improvement of four major challenges:

Siting new power transmission (and accepted a new route, and the country) is a local object to recover constructionDetermining fair approach to the construction costs in a single Member State, when a new row contains financial and system performance benefits long-distance power transmission network reaches new sites with high-quality of renewable natural resources are located in the out-of-the State built transmission line customersEnsuring, often far away from areas where the electricity demand is concentrated. Addressing federal regulatory procedures regarding who is responsible for payment of the new power transmission lines; this uncertainty affects the uncertainty associated with the private sector to raise money to build them.

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

What is the status of the U.s. nuclear industry?

Dr. Enrico Fermi started 2. December 1942 football stadium Chicago University, in the first controlled bleachers nuclear chain reaction. The test is performed from the atomic bomb programme as part of the led also atom, including the construction of the first US nuclear power plant, Shippingport, Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, in 1957, peaceful.


Mississippi River water sources close to the most commercial reactors are located in the East of the United States. Illinois is usually reactors (11), and most of the nuclear capacity.The two largest reactors in the United States, each more than 1300 net megawatts, which are located in Palo Verde in Arizona.(482 Net megawatts) the lowest reactor is Fort Calhoun, Nebraska.


The last new reactor commercial was Tennessee Valley Authority's (IDENTIFICATION NUMBER) Watts Bar 1 Tennessee in 1996. construction in 2007 with regard to the extension of the other new reactor, Watts Bar 2, which is slated for valaistusasennuksen in 2012. The other two early closure of units 1 and 2, Bellefonte, Alabama, construction continues to stay, but the NUMBER is left open the possibility that the reactors in the end can be filled in.


The plant's size refers to the status of the body can contain. nuclear and non-nuclear units.Each commercial nuclear reactor at is the component that you create has its own unique nuclear personnel, equipment and generators. Reactor is heat, steam to the generator, which in turn provides electricity.


More than half of the United States at least two nuclear reactors.Even if some foreign nuclear power plants up to eight units, only three US plants have more than two operational reactors: Palo Verde Meteor, Browns Ferry Alabama and Oconee, South Carolina has three reactors.


Natural gas represents the highest proportion existing within the electric power generation capacity, coal is the second, third, that the decommissioning of nuclear power plants in the normal course of the fourth hydroelectric power. Natural gas CatGenie Automatic capacity is nearly four times as large as the nuclear capacity, but the fuel and other operating costs, creating electricity are lower than natural gas, nuclear power stations. Accordingly, the decommissioning of nuclear power plants as a general rule, be used to their maximum capacity should natural gas plants are normally imposed from time to time, with the peak demand to serve. In 2008, nuclear electricity generation accounted for almost 20% share of 21% the share of natural gas.


United States of America is the most nuclear capacity and generation of 31 countries of the world, is the commercial, secondly, the decommissioning of France most nuclear capacity in order to satisfy the country relies on nuclear power for almost 80% of its electricity.Other countries that a significant part of their electricity from nuclear power are Japan, Russia, South Korea and Germany.

Bar chart showing nuclear generation in 2008. The top 10 countries produce 2,205 million net Megawatthours (MWh). The top 10 countries are, in order from highest generation to lowest generation, the United States, France, Japan, Russia, South Korea, Germany, Canada, Ukraine, China, and Sweden. Nuclear generation for all 31 countries (.xls). Source: Source: International Atomic Energy Agency, Power Reactor Information System File.

Nuclear waste is solid wastes, which are stored carefully, because it is radioactive and contaminate anything with which it comes into contact, including liquids.Currently, most commercial nuclear wastes are stored in a high level of on-the-spot inspections of nuclear power plants.3. June 2008, the Department provided access to an application, the nuclear regulatory Commission (NRC) the high level waste geologic repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. the future of this site is currently doubts and alternative approaches for the storage of nuclear waste are considered.


Nuclear power generation in the air itself contribute to the emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), an important greenhouse gas, even if the associated activities such as nuclear reactors for the production of results in carbon dioxide emissions.Currently the next size greenhouse gas-emitting electricity generating technologies between conventional hydropower, representing around 6% of the US electricity generation.


Although the five nuclear plants were retired in 1997 and 1998, nuclear capacity is the same as in 1996, the line became Watts Bar 1 establishments. technical changes (called uprates) to increase the capacity of existing plants has made this possible. These uprates together with high utilisation is enabled in the nuclear sector, relating to maintain continuously represents around 20% of electricity production capacity needed to communicate with. or even close to many nuclear plants to maintain the current percentage depends on the new reactors are built.


By the end of February 2009 in NRC had received applications for a total of 26 newly designed reactors. There is uncertainty about how many of these reactors are built, but in the end, NRC will assess by the end of 42 months from all applications prior to a definitive decision again. typically requires each reactor Construction of another five to seven years. EIA projects industry adds approximately 8 gigawatts (= variable MW) a new nuclear power plant capacity, the capacity exists between 2008 and 2035.1 Uprates add additional 4 gigawatts.

Monday, September 13, 2010

What is the upper limit of and trade in program and how does it work?

CAP and trade program is intended to reduce the emissions of pollutants to be carried out by placing a limit (or cap), the total amount of emissions, environmental policy tool that can be released during the period of the programme sources covered by the flat-rate.

General position on emissions allowances shall be adopted in accordance with the system.For each emission allowance shall be entitled to send a certain amount and within the scope of the programme of each emissions source is sufficient compensation to cover the actual emissions. these allowances are sometimes called, are the sources of vulnerability originally intended or auctioned for differing durations of the implementation of the programme of the Agency.

Image of how a cap-and-trade program works
Image source: Julie Ridge

Allowances can be traded, which creates an incentive for those who may be possible to reduce emissions at a great price to sell those who face higher costs of reducing emissions of their compensation. emission allowance trading an incentive shall continue to apply as long as one or more sources to reduce emissions at a lower cost than other source face in order to achieve the last unit of measure as creating. Consequently, the compensation to be marketed until päästövähennys marginal cost equals from various sources, in compliance with the terms and conditions.At this point, the pipe may be required by reason of the pollution level is reached — in theory — possible at low cost to society, irrespective of how the compensation was initially.

All CAP and trade programs are the same. below is a list of the four properties that are shared by all CAP and trade programs are displayed in some of the possible variations.These variations can affect the operation of a specific program.

1. the limit or the notional amount of the pollutant emissions is established.

Variations in:

Which need to limit their emissions. Is it all or only some of the sources? How range covers.Whether the region or Member State, or the entire United Nations Group?When emission limit values affect.Position will be introduced in the near future or later? Whether the pipe will be called for here, which means the total time allowed emissions drops. If so, how fast the invoice?When position is a stationary. It is valid for one season — such as for the summer months — or so are used throughout the year?

2. the allowance shall be subject to the obligation of each unit (often ton) emissions are created.

Variations in:

That must be provided to the allowances.This depends on the CAP and trade in a particular program, some examples include pollutants with producers for the production or consumption creates emissions, States or even Nations product distributors.How allocation at the outset.Compensation could be auctioned for differing durations, is distributed free of charge on the basis of current or historical emissions, or because a combination of auction and free distribution of allowances will be sold at an auction. most providers. Auction revenue is allocated on a specific Cork and trade program and may be part of consumer income distribution. Whether the program will instead of compensation for the purchase offsets.Transitions is certified emission reductions from sources that are not required for the CAP and trade program in order to limit their emissions.

3. the Compensation may be the subject of trade.

The following is an example of how trade could serve. Emitter ABC been really easy and cheap to reduce the scope of the adjustments for the supply of XYZ had stricter below the level at a time.ABC is could have reduced by higher rikkidioksidipäästöjä and offered to sell the additional adjustments XYZ.This event was a good offer XYZ because it acquired the level of the cost of benefits was that it had before you buy the more allowances than ABC a number of allowances for their emissions lower than the required hardware costs.

Variations in:

How much compensation costs.As a general rule, the allowance price depends on reducing emissions, and the options available to demand compensation.If the relatively cheap alternatives with a view to reducing emissions, this compensation price is lower.Whether emitters have the right to store — or "Bank" — allowances, either of its own, so that they can be reused or sold at a later date to someone else.Some of the proposals also may need to allow future time allowances is now enabled.

4. actual emissions shall be measured and penalties will be assessed if the aims are missed.

Change:

Depending on the program, these tasks may be one or more of the institutes of the State.

Fossil fuels, coal, oil and natural gas, including combustion is the most important — the most important greenhouse gas carbon dioxide produced by human activity — and other major source of emissions Cap and trade program., with greenhouse gas emissions would increase using fossil fuels, making them less competitive with fossil fuels, and energy consumers, increasing the cost of mining General. with the highest concentration of carbon dioxide and energy among the lowest unit price of fossil fuels, the cost of most affected trade in greenhouse gas emissions cap and program.

CAP and trade program allows emitters must have flexibility in their approach to reduce emissions into the environment may require Alternate. each regulated source use emission control technology and trade program. Cap on emissions general position has been fixed, but are carried out in accordance with the approach of a single source need not be indicated this flexibility enables parties. cheapest option and to reach the General emissions ceiling in order to reduce the cost would be.

CAP and trade program in the US sulphur dioxide for financial years beginning in 1995, is an example of flexibility in the implementation of the results in a reduction of the environmental costs of energy, a sulphur dioxide emission allowances for staff whose service is terminated benefits. Sulphur was active on the market, including coal fired electricity generating units covered by the programme chose different strategies are complied with. these strategies is included in the installing scrubbers, sulphur, carbon and purchases.

CAP and trade programs have been used for a wide range of State, United States of America, and international fora in order to limit emissions.

As stated above, sulphur carbon dioxide emissions cap and trade program has been operating in the United States after The European Union's 1995. its 2005. In 2009, the greenhouse gas emissions Trading System, the regional Greenhouse Gas initiative was established as the interstate Cork and trade system, which covers the electric power plants 10 northeastern States emissions of greenhouse gases. recently, there has been much debate about the Federal greenhouse gas emissions nationwide Cork and trade programme.

Sunday, September 12, 2010

What kind of role of liquefied natural gas (LNG) to play the energy source in the US?

Although the United States of America it is the responsibility of the importer for liquefied natural gas (LNG), is also an exporter. Only the export facility for liquefied natural gas (LNG), and the oldest active marine terminal for liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the United States, is located in the Kenai, Alaska. The Terminal has exported small liquefied natural gas (LNG) and Japan after almost continuously pursues an activity in 1969.


Natural gas, liquefied natural gas (LNG) that has been cooled to approximately 260 degrees Fahrenheit supply or storage of a non-flammable than less. Liquid gas volume of about 600 times lower than its gaseous form.This compact form natural gas tankers can be delivered to specific receiving terminals in the United States and the general public of importing countries. these terminals for liquefied natural gas (LNG) returned to gaseous form and transported by pipeline across territory distribution companies and industrial consumers power plants.


Traditionally, liquefying gas provided a way to long distances when the pipeline transport moving, it was not possible to access natural gas than in regions with the highest production, if any, that are too far away from the end-use market by pipeline to be connected. Currently, THE LNG industry worldwide has increased in such a way that the distance is just one of many factors that may affect the development OF THE LNG project.


Liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports to the US were generally not considered to be competitive on the domestic supply of natural gas and pipeline imports from Canada in the 1980s and 1990s, the result is low for liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports for the period in question. This concept began to change at the beginning of the 1990s punk rock album-gas production time and the United States has the highest gas prices increased significantly.Now has two US imports include is opened, which was at idle, when gas prices dropped in the early 1980s except five new terminals Simpsons Checks structure has been designed since 2005.


LNG imports are expected to have a production capacity of more than six times in 2009, it was the beginning of the Decade.Increase the capacity of the receiving liquefied natural gas (LNG) and offers opportunities to grow the u.s. LNG imports vis-à-vis the us in the coming years. Annual importation is estimated to be exceeded 1 trillion cubic feet of 2015.1, the importation of natural gas currently account for a further period of requirements in the United States, a small part is only 1.5% in 2008.


Liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports to the US growth has been uneven over the last few years, significant changes over the imports of suppliers each year to bring spare cargos decisions either a u.s. or to divert the cargos to countries where prices may be higher. In 2007 a number of key low gas prices in the liquefied natural gas (LNG) and efficient outside North America caused a liquefied natural gas (LNG) supply of the world and cargos emergency measures in the case of a surplus or the North American market, which is by far the largest area of the natural gas market in the world.When outside of North America prices increased in 2008, the u.s. importation declined 54% from 2007 by means of a high-771 billion cubic metres in feet 352 billion cubic metres of feet (Bcf).


Liquefied natural gas (LNG), the US high global demand during the prices do not generally show the same competitive prices offered by buyers in other countries.This is, for example, Japan and South Korea, two of the largest LNG efficient countries in the world, are almost entirely dependent on LNG their considerable demand for natural gas.These countries often link to liquefied natural gas (LNG) and the price of crude oil prices directly, with energy-equivalent of recently been significantly more expensive than natural gas in North America. deliveries of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and direct-mail campaign in the United States and the European (often referred to as the Atlantic area trade) final destination is determined, to a large extent, these competing market price of natural gas.However, other factors such as existing contracts (some of the prices of oil prices), the available capacity and uudelleenkaasuunnuttamispalvelut available storage also meaning.


Trinidad and Tobago, South Caribbean Sea, deliveries of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and most of the liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports into the USA.Located in Fort Point, Trinidad and Tobago, the Atlantic LNG processing plant produces now almost 700 Bcf per year.In recent years in several African countries, including Egypt, Equatorial Guinea and Nigeria, the United States have also provided LNG. Algeria that until 1995 was the only vendor in the USA, the liquefied natural gas (LNG) and African countries has also submitted to the United States in recent years, LNG, but rare.


Also supplies started to enter the Kingdom of Norway on the Snohvit LNG project. Snohvit project is the first export of liquefied natural gas (LNG) project in Western Europe. Qatar in the Middle East, the largest exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and in the world, has given the liquefied natural gas (LNG) and rarely to the United States in a context of continuing its production capacity. Qatar in the next few years in the United States is expected to be steady supply in 2009. Russia and Yemen for the first time the LNG exporters. However, from these countries is expected to reach Us at regular intervals.

Saturday, September 11, 2010

Top ten Bills-05. week of September 2010

H.R. 3590
Patient protection and affordable Care Act
H.R. comp/m.4173
American restore the financial soundness of the financial year 2010
H.R. 4646
Debt Free America Act
H.R. comp/m.4213
American Jobs and closing openings in the 2010 tax
H.R. 1586
FAA Air Transportation Modernization and improving the security of the law
H.R. 4872
Health and CatGenie Washable Granules education reconciliation year 2010
H.R. 3534
Consolidated land, energy and Aquatic Resources for 2009
5297 H.R.
Small Business employment and Credit year 2010
H.R. 6269
United States Postal Service CSRS to change in 2010
H.R. 1
The American recovery and Reinvestment in 2009

Thursday, September 9, 2010

Who are the major operators in the world oil market?

Error in deserializing body of reply message for operation 'Translate'. The maximum string content length quota (8192) has been exceeded while reading XML data. This quota may be increased by changing the MaxStringContentLength property on the XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas object used when creating the XML reader. Line 2, position 8125.
Error in deserializing body of reply message for operation 'Translate'. The maximum string content length quota (8192) has been exceeded while reading XML data. This quota may be increased by changing the MaxStringContentLength property on the XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas object used when creating the XML reader. Line 1, position 8921.
EIA's Energy in Brief: Who are the major players supplying the world oil market? Home > Energy in Brief > Who are the major players supplying the world oil market?Energy in Brief - What everyone should know about energyLast Updated: January 28, 2009< All Energy in Brief Articles Who are the major players supplying the world oil market?

Governments of oil-rich countries have a major influence on the world supply of oil through ownership of national oil companies and, for some governments, their membership in OPEC.

OPEC member countries held over three-quarters of the world's proven oil reserves at the end of 2006. Pie chart showing: Proven Oil Reserve Holders - OPEC, 76%; Former Soviet Union countries, 11%; Other, 13%. Source: BP Statistical Review of World Energy (2007).Pie chart showing: Reserves to which International Oil Companies have Full Access, 6%; Reserves Held by New Russian Companies, 6%; Reserves Held by National Oil Companies (equity access), 10%; Reserves Held by National Oil Companies (limited equity access), 78%. Source: PFC Energy, 2008.Did You Know?

The United States has no national oil company. The largest three U.S.-based international oil companies (ExxonMobil, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips) are accountable to their shareholders, not the United States government.

There are three simple ways of approaching this question. One is by comparing the basic differences between investor-owned companies and government-controlled companies. Another is to examine the role that governments play in general. The third is by comparing the differences between Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and non-OPEC member countries, specifically.

Although investor-owned oil companies are often thought of as those most responsible for world oil production, government-controlled companies actually control the majority of both current production (more than 52% in 2007) and proven reserves (88% in 2007), one indicator of future production potential.

Investor-owned and government-controlled oil companies often operate differently

Let's first examine the differences in the three types of companies that currently supply essentially all crude oil to the world. The distinction between these three types of companies is important because each has different general operational strategies and production-related goals.

Investor-owned oil companies, including ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch Shell, and BP (formerly known as British Petroleum), are primarily concerned with maximizing shareholder return. These companies, often referred to as international oil companies (IOCs), typically move quickly to develop and produce the oil resources to which they have obtained access and sell their output in competitive markets. National oil companies with strategic and operational autonomy that function as corporate entities, including Petrobras (Brazil) and Statoil (Norway), often balance profit-oriented concerns and the objectives of their country into the development of their corporate strategy. While these companies may support their country's goals, they are primarily commercially-driven entities. National oil companies that operate as an extension of the government or a government agency, including Saudi Aramco (Saudi Arabia), Pemex (Mexico), and PDVSA (Venezuela), support their government's programs either financially or strategically. They also provide fuels to domestic consumers at prices lower than world customers pay. These companies do not always have the incentive, means, or intention to develop their proven reserves at the same pace as commercial companies. Due to the diverse situations and objectives of the governments of their countries, these national oil companies pursue a wide variety of objectives that are not necessarily market-oriented, such as employing their citizens, furthering a government's domestic or foreign policy objectives, generating long-term revenue, and supplying inexpensive domestic energy. Countries are also major players in the world oil market

In addition to influencing the operation of national oil companies, governments of oil-rich countries can directly impact world oil supplies by changing financial regulations, e.g., tax structures. Such a change would force commercially-oriented companies to change production plans or form strategic alliances with other major producing nations, such as OPEC members. As the majority of reserves becomes increasingly concentrated in fewer countries, changes in leadership or strategic alliances of individual countries have more substantial effects on world oil supply and energy markets than in past years.

OPEC countries work together to influence world oil supplies

OPEC is a group of some of the world's most oil-rich countries that coordinate their oil production policies. As of January 2009, there are twelve member countries in OPEC: Algeria, Angola, Ecuador, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Venezuela. Together, they controlled approximately three-quarters of the world's total oil proven reserves in 2007.

OPEC attempts to influence the amount of oil available to the world by assigning a production quota to each member except Iraq, for which no quota is presently set. The track record of compliance with OPEC quotas is mixed, as production decisions are ultimately in the hands of the individual member countries. All OPEC member countries have a national oil company and most also allow international oil companies to operate within their borders. An OPEC member country wishing to reduce output in response to a cut in its quota implements its decision by restricting the production of the oil companies operating within its borders. Taken together, the decisions made by OPEC members influence the overall oil market by determining how much of the gap between world demand and non-OPEC supply is filled by their production.

In 2007, roughly 78% of total world oil was produced by 50 companies, and of that production, about 70% was produced by national oil companies. Pie chart showing: Total Oil Production (*1) 2007 (million barrels per day) - other National Oil Companies, 31%; other companies (*2), 22%; other International Oil Companies, 18%; Saudi Aramco, 12%; National Iranian Oil Company, 5%; Pemex, 4%; Exxon Mobil, 3%; BP, 3%; Royal Dutch Shell, 2%. Source: Petroleum Intelligence Weekly, (Vol XLVII, No. 48). December 1, 2008. Note: *1 - Total oil production includes crude oil, natural gas liquids, and condensates; *2 - Includes smaller companies outside of the top 50 producers.

Oil reserves are increasingly concentrated in OPEC countries and national oil companies

OPEC countries and national oil companies already hold the majority of proven oil reserves, and the percentage of reserves they hold is increasing. This concentration further establishes their future importance as major players in the world oil market and could potentially increase market tension and upward pressure on prices as world oil demand rises.

Learn MoreOil Production Brief history of OPEC Role of National Oil Companies More on National Oil Companies (PDF) share icon Share this pageReceive Energy in Brief Updates

Sign up to receive Energy in Brief updates via email!

envelope icon Sign up for more email updatesRSS icon Get the Energy in Brief RSS feed What is RSS? Give Us Your Feedback!

Do you have comments or suggestions about our Energy in Brief pages? We want to hear from you!

Email Address: Energy Information Administration (EIA) Logo - Need Help? 202-586-8800
For larger graphs and maps, and other Energy in Briefs, please visit www.eia.gov/eib